Open course
websites can offer many types of learning. As reviewing, I seemed to
have a love hate relationship with the layout of
www.openculture.com.
As an avid user of
the internet, I would say that my biggest complaint about this site
is the forever scrolling of the page. To me, this is a nuisance, and
I would rather have separate pages to find things. Many times the
information gets lost as its at the bottom of the page and buried
withing the site. This is also a problem when learning. The eye has
to continue to jump as its reading the page. “Each medium has its
own aesthetic” (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek 2012 p
172). This can be detrimental to students with learning needs
(Simonson, et al 2012 p 174).
There are positives
to this page, as colors and the font are eye pleasing. Although these
may seem silly positives, its important to have these qualities, for
when I stare at a computer for a large amount of time, my eyes tire,
the bright colors speed up the process.
I do feel like the
site was overwhelming, and I have a feeling that if a teacher can
feel this way, I can only imagine what others feel like. I feel like
looking through all the different options lacked organization. There
was no clear place for communication which Simonson, Smaldino,
Albright and Zvacek suggests is important for students to received
feedback. As I navigated the site more and more searching for online
courses and other things that might appeal to me I found my eyes
wondering toward ads and other distracting things. To me this was
part of the disturbance that would occur within the classroom.
“Classroom distractions are noise, as is ambiguous or unfamiliar
information” (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek 2012 p
91).
All these lacks
make it less and less appealing for distance education and from a
instructional design point of view. I did click on a few different
courses and explore the possibilities only to be more drawn away from
each site. I chose to look at a few different literature classes.
The page was a picture of the professor, a list of resources and a
link to join the study group. I didn't see the actual learning
modules.
There are many
positives to this site. Many of the courses have websites, as well as
audio or audio and video presentations. There is also a RSS feed and
other social network links available. “The effective use of a
variety of media to facilitate communication, combined with criticial
quantities of well-structured face to face instruction and learning,
have characterized many distance-delivered programs” (Simonson et
al 2012 p 175).
This site could be very useful with a
better layout. I think that it lacks organization and a well thought
out plan. It took planning to collaborate all these parts, but how
the site is presented lacks professionalism.
References:
Open Culture (2012) Literature Free
Courses. Retrieved from: www.openculture.com
No comments:
Post a Comment